Feb 09 2015
‘Palestine’ Is Becoming a Bad Word in Washington
By Daoud Kuttab
The U.S. response to the efforts by Palestinian president to join international organizations, including the International Criminal Court (ICC), is puzzling.
The spokeswoman of the U.S. State Department made an unusual attack in trying to express Washington’s opposition. “The United States does not believe Palestine is a sovereign state and, therefore, does not qualify to be part of the International Criminal Court,” said Jan Psaki after the UN secretary general confirmed that Palestine’s application to the ICC has been officially accepted.
That Palestine is not a sovereign state is not disputed; that is exactly the problem which has been around for 47 years and which the latest UN Security Council resolution would have rectified, had it not been for the U.S. negative vote and unfair pressures on African countries.
The Palestinian president has stated clearly for some time that if the UN Security Council does not address this problem, the UN’s latest non-member state will join the Rome Statute which regulates the issue of the criminal court.
Before the beginning of the Madrid Peace process that led to the Oslo Accords, Americans were careful not to use the term Palestine. James Baker, the U.S. secretary of state, instructed his staff to use the term Palestinians rather than refer to Palestine. But all this changed after Oslo. Continue Reading »